Q | Losses | |||
1 | Florida | 157 | 1 | |
2 | Texas | 154 | 1 | |
3 | Utah | 153 | 0 | |
4 | Oklahoma | 151 | 2 | |
5 | So California | 145 | 1 | |
6 | Texas Tech | 140 | 2 | |
7 | Boise St | 140 | 1 | |
8 | Alabama | 139 | 2 | |
9 | Texas Christian | 138 | 2 | |
10 | Georgia | 137 | 3 | |
11 | Pennsylvania St | 136 | 2 | |
12 | Ohio St | 134 | 3 | |
13 | Cinncinati | 129 | 3 | |
14 | Pittsburg | 127 | 4 | |
15 | Oregon St | 126 | 4 | |
16 | Oregon | 126 | 3 | |
17 | Missouri | 126 | 4 | |
18 | Virginia Tech | 125 | 4 | |
19 | Florida St | 125 | 4 | |
20 | Mississippi | 124 | 4 | |
21 | Michigan St | 123 | 4 | |
22 | Oklahoma St | 123 | 4 | |
23 | Nebraska | 122 | 4 | |
24 | Ball St | 122 | 2 | |
25 | California | 121 | 4 | |
26 | Rice | 121 | 3 | |
27 | Brigham Young | 121 | 3 | |
28 | Georgia Tech | 120 | 4 | |
29 | West Virginia | 119 | 4 | |
30 | Kansas | 118 | 5 | |
31 | Boston Coll | 117 | 5 | |
32 | Iowa | 115 | 4 | |
33 | Tulsa | 115 | 3 | |
34 | Wake Forest | 115 | 5 | |
35 | No Carolina | 114 | 5 | |
36 | Louisiana St | 113 | 5 | |
37 | Rutgers | 112 | 5 | |
38 | Maryland | 112 | 5 | |
39 | Air Force | 112 | 5 | |
40 | Northwestern | 111 | 4 | |
41 | West Michigan | 111 | 4 | |
42 | Connecticut | 111 | 5 | |
43 | East Carolina | 110 | 5 | |
44 | So Florida | 109 | 5 | |
45 | Vanderbilt | 108 | 6 | |
46 | So Carolina | 108 | 6 | |
47 | Navy | 107 | 5 | |
48 | Miami Florida | 106 | 6 | |
49 | Arizona | 106 | 5 | |
50 | Houston | 105 | 5 | |
51 | Colorado St | 105 | 6 | |
52 | Clemson | 105 | 6 | |
53 | Buffalo | 104 | 6 | |
54 | Kentucky | 102 | 6 | |
55 | Cent Michigan | 102 | 5 | |
56 | Wisconsin | 102 | 6 | |
57 | Notre Dame | 101 | 6 | |
58 | Troy | 101 | 5 | |
59 | Nevada | 99 | 6 | |
60 | Arkansas | 99 | 7 | |
61 | Louisiana Tech | 99 | 5 | |
62 | No Carolina St | 98 | 7 | |
63 | Minnesota | 98 | 6 | |
64 | Virginia | 97 | 7 | |
65 | So Mississippi | 97 | 6 | |
66 | Fresno St | 96 | 6 | |
67 | Florida Atlantic | 96 | 6 | |
68 | Hawai'i | 96 | 7 | |
69 | Colorado | 95 | 7 | |
70 | Stanford | 94 | 7 | |
71 | Tennessee | 93 | 7 | |
72 | Illinois | 93 | 7 | |
73 | Auburn | 92 | 7 | |
74 | Texas El Paso | 89 | 7 | |
75 | Bowling Green | 89 | 6 | |
76 | Arizona St | 89 | 7 | |
77 | Nevada Las Vegas | 89 | 7 | |
78 | Louisville | 88 | 7 | |
79 | San Jose St | 88 | 6 | |
80 | Baylor | 88 | 8 | |
81 | Arkansas St | 88 | 6 | |
82 | Louisiana Lafayette | 87 | 6 | |
83 | Kansas St | 86 | 7 | |
84 | New Mexico | 86 | 8 | |
85 | Purdue | 86 | 8 | |
86 | California Los Angeles | 85 | 8 | |
87 | Temple | 84 | 7 | |
88 | No Illinois | 84 | 7 | |
89 | Texas A&M | 84 | 8 | |
90 | Duke | 83 | 8 | |
91 | Memphis | 82 | 7 | |
92 | Mississippi St | 81 | 8 | |
93 | Akron | 81 | 7 | |
94 | Marshall | 81 | 8 | |
95 | Florida International | 80 | 7 | |
96 | Wyoming | 79 | 8 | |
97 | Syracuse | 79 | 9 | |
98 | Utah St | 79 | 9 | |
99 | Michigan | 78 | 9 | |
100 | Mid Tennessee St | 77 | 7 | |
101 | Army | 72 | 8 | |
102 | Ohio | 72 | 8 | |
103 | Alabama Birmingham | 71 | 8 | |
104 | Cent Florida | 71 | 8 | |
105 | Indiana | 70 | 9 | |
106 | San Diego St | 69 | 9 | |
107 | Toledo | 67 | 9 | |
108 | Kent St | 66 | 8 | |
109 | Louisiana Monroe | 65 | 8 | |
110 | East Michigan | 65 | 9 | |
111 | New Mexico St | 63 | 9 | |
112 | Tulane | 62 | 10 | |
113 | Washington St | 59 | 11 | |
114 | Washington | 58 | 12 | |
115 | Iowa St | 56 | 10 | |
116 | Idaho | 54 | 10 | |
117 | So Methodist | 53 | 11 | |
118 | Miami Ohio | 51 | 10 | |
119 | No Texas | 50 | 11 | |
120 | West Kentucky | 47 | 10 |
An objective calculation for ranking NCAA Division 1 FBS football teams based only on wins per game of the team, of their opponents, and of the opponents' opponents.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
2008 Final Ranking
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
21 Dec 2024 Ranking (after the 1st round of the CFP)
Rank Team Q Losses Next CFP opponent 1 Oregon 153 ...
-
The only values used in the calculation are: When the team plays a game (G) Whether the team wins (W) The wins per game of the ...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 149 0 2 Orego...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 145 0 2 Orego...
No comments:
Post a Comment