Q | Losses | |||
1 | Florida | 157 | 0 | |
2 | Alabama | 157 | 0 | |
3 | Texas | 154 | 0 | |
4 | Texas Christian | 151 | 0 | |
5 | Cincinnati | 150 | 0 | |
6 | Iowa | 145 | 1 | |
7 | Georgia Tech | 143 | 1 | |
8 | Boise St | 138 | 0 | |
9 | Oregon | 138 | 2 | |
10 | Wisconsin | 137 | 2 | |
11 | Virginia Tech | 137 | 3 | |
12 | Houston | 137 | 1 | |
13 | Louisiana St | 135 | 2 | |
14 | Ohio St | 135 | 2 | |
15 | Pittsburg | 134 | 1 | |
16 | Miami Florida | 134 | 2 | |
17 | Pennsylvania St | 132 | 2 | |
18 | Oklahoma St | 131 | 2 | |
19 | So California | 130 | 2 | |
20 | Arizona | 128 | 2 | |
21 | Oregon St | 127 | 3 | |
22 | So Florida | 124 | 2 | |
23 | Clemson | 123 | 3 | |
24 | West Virginia | 122 | 2 | |
25 | Temple | 121 | 1 | |
26 | Utah | 121 | 1 | |
27 | Brigham Young | 120 | 2 | |
28 | Auburn | 120 | 3 | |
29 | Navy | 119 | 3 | |
30 | Notre Dame | 118 | 3 | |
31 | Troy | 117 | 2 | |
32 | Boston Coll | 116 | 3 | |
33 | Rutgers | 116 | 2 | |
34 | Nebraska | 114 | 3 | |
35 | No Carolina | 113 | 3 | |
36 | Texas Tech | 113 | 3 | |
37 | Oklahoma | 113 | 4 | |
38 | Arkansas | 113 | 4 | |
39 | California | 112 | 3 | |
40 | Cent Michigan | 112 | 2 | |
41 | Tennessee | 112 | 4 | |
42 | Fresno St | 111 | 3 | |
43 | Stanford | 111 | 3 | |
44 | Georgia | 111 | 4 | |
45 | Mississippi | 108 | 3 | |
46 | Kentucky | 108 | 4 | |
47 | Missouri | 106 | 4 | |
48 | Minnesota | 106 | 5 | |
49 | So Carolina | 105 | 4 | |
50 | Idaho | 105 | 3 | |
51 | Mississippi St | 105 | 5 | |
52 | California Los Angeles | 104 | 5 | |
53 | Florida St | 104 | 5 | |
54 | Air Force | 104 | 4 | |
55 | Michigan St | 102 | 5 | |
56 | Connecticut | 101 | 5 | |
57 | Washington | 101 | 6 | |
58 | Nevada | 100 | 3 | |
59 | Kansas St | 100 | 4 | |
60 | Iowa St | 99 | 5 | |
61 | Purdue | 99 | 6 | |
62 | Duke | 99 | 3 | |
63 | Northwestern | 98 | 4 | |
64 | Kansas | 98 | 4 | |
65 | Texas A&M | 97 | 4 | |
66 | Virginia | 97 | 5 | |
67 | So Methodist | 97 | 4 | |
68 | No Illinois | 96 | 3 | |
69 | Mid Tennessee St | 96 | 3 | |
70 | Marshall | 95 | 4 | |
71 | East Carolina | 95 | 4 | |
72 | Bowling Green | 95 | 5 | |
73 | Cent Florida | 94 | 4 | |
74 | Louisiana Monroe | 92 | 4 | |
75 | Syracuse | 90 | 6 | |
76 | Ohio | 90 | 3 | |
77 | Michigan | 90 | 5 | |
78 | So Mississippi | 90 | 4 | |
79 | Arizona St | 89 | 5 | |
80 | Wake Forest | 89 | 6 | |
81 | Baylor | 87 | 5 | |
82 | Wyoming | 87 | 5 | |
83 | Colorado | 87 | 6 | |
84 | Louisville | 86 | 6 | |
85 | Alabama Birmingham | 85 | 5 | |
86 | Toledo | 84 | 5 | |
87 | Nevada Las Vegas | 83 | 6 | |
88 | San Diego St | 83 | 5 | |
89 | Indiana | 83 | 6 | |
90 | Louisiana Lafayette | 82 | 4 | |
91 | Colorado St | 81 | 7 | |
92 | Illinois | 78 | 6 | |
93 | No Carolina St | 76 | 5 | |
94 | Tulsa | 76 | 5 | |
95 | Tulane | 75 | 6 | |
96 | Louisiana Tech | 75 | 6 | |
97 | Kent St | 74 | 5 | |
98 | Texas El Paso | 74 | 6 | |
99 | San Jose St | 72 | 7 | |
100 | Buffalo | 72 | 6 | |
101 | West Michigan | 71 | 6 | |
102 | Washington St | 70 | 8 | |
103 | Florida Atlantic | 69 | 6 | |
104 | Florida International | 68 | 7 | |
105 | Army | 68 | 6 | |
106 | Hawai'i | 68 | 6 | |
107 | Miami Ohio | 67 | 9 | |
108 | No Texas | 65 | 7 | |
109 | Vanderbilt | 65 | 8 | |
110 | Arkansas St | 64 | 6 | |
111 | New Mexico St | 61 | 6 | |
112 | Utah St | 61 | 7 | |
113 | Maryland | 60 | 7 | |
114 | Memphis | 58 | 7 | |
115 | Akron | 56 | 7 | |
116 | Ball St | 50 | 7 | |
117 | West Kentucky | 47 | 8 | |
118 | Rice | 44 | 9 | |
119 | East Michigan | 43 | 9 | |
120 | New Mexico | 42 | 9 |
An objective calculation for ranking NCAA Division 1 FBS football teams based only on wins per game of the team, of their opponents, and of the opponents' opponents.
Monday, November 9, 2009
7 November 2009 Ranking
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2024-2025 Ranking Final
Rank Team Q Losses 1 Ohio St 152.1 2 2 ...
-
The only values used in the calculation are: When the team plays a game (G) Whether the team wins (W) The wins per game of the ...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 149 0 2 Orego...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 145 0 2 Orego...
No comments:
Post a Comment