Q | Losses | |||
1 | Florida | 168 | 0 | |
2 | Iowa | 166 | 0 | |
3 | Texas Christian | 158 | 0 | |
4 | Texas | 155 | 0 | |
5 | Alabama | 155 | 0 | |
6 | Cincinnati | 155 | 0 | |
7 | Boise St | 150 | 0 | |
8 | Virginia Tech | 150 | 2 | |
9 | Georgia Tech | 145 | 1 | |
10 | Oregon | 145 | 1 | |
11 | Louisiana St | 143 | 1 | |
12 | Miami Florida | 140 | 1 | |
13 | Arizona | 134 | 2 | |
14 | Wisconsin | 134 | 2 | |
15 | So California | 134 | 1 | |
16 | Oklahoma St | 134 | 1 | |
17 | Houston | 134 | 1 | |
18 | Pennsylvania St | 131 | 1 | |
19 | West Virginia | 129 | 1 | |
20 | Kansas | 129 | 1 | |
21 | Pittsburg | 129 | 1 | |
22 | Notre Dame | 126 | 2 | |
23 | California | 124 | 2 | |
24 | Ohio St | 124 | 2 | |
25 | So Carolina | 123 | 2 | |
26 | Oregon St | 121 | 2 | |
27 | Michigan | 121 | 2 | |
28 | Arkansas | 120 | 3 | |
29 | Auburn | 120 | 2 | |
30 | Georgia | 119 | 3 | |
31 | Washington | 118 | 4 | |
32 | Virginia | 117 | 2 | |
33 | Nebraska | 117 | 2 | |
34 | No Carolina | 117 | 2 | |
35 | Navy | 116 | 2 | |
36 | Texas Tech | 115 | 2 | |
37 | Oklahoma | 115 | 3 | |
38 | Cent Michigan | 115 | 1 | |
39 | Idaho | 114 | 1 | |
40 | Kentucky | 112 | 3 | |
41 | Connecticut | 112 | 2 | |
42 | Utah | 112 | 1 | |
43 | Arizona St | 111 | 2 | |
44 | Boston Coll | 111 | 2 | |
45 | Clemson | 110 | 3 | |
46 | Temple | 110 | 1 | |
47 | Minnesota | 110 | 3 | |
48 | Brigham Young | 110 | 1 | |
49 | So Florida | 109 | 1 | |
50 | Tennessee | 108 | 3 | |
51 | Missouri | 108 | 2 | |
52 | Iowa St | 107 | 3 | |
53 | Mississippi | 107 | 2 | |
54 | California Los Angeles | 105 | 3 | |
55 | Troy | 105 | 2 | |
56 | Colorado St | 105 | 4 | |
57 | Duke | 105 | 2 | |
58 | Michigan St | 105 | 3 | |
59 | Colorado | 103 | 4 | |
60 | Rutgers | 102 | 2 | |
61 | Louisiana Lafayette | 101 | 2 | |
62 | Louisiana Monroe | 100 | 2 | |
63 | Air Force | 99 | 3 | |
64 | Stanford | 99 | 3 | |
65 | Marshall | 98 | 3 | |
66 | Florida St | 97 | 4 | |
67 | Mississippi St | 95 | 4 | |
68 | Kansas St | 94 | 3 | |
69 | Ohio | 93 | 2 | |
70 | Fresno St | 93 | 3 | |
71 | Wake Forest | 91 | 3 | |
72 | East Carolina | 91 | 3 | |
73 | Bowling Green | 91 | 4 | |
74 | So Mississippi | 91 | 3 | |
75 | So Methodist | 90 | 3 | |
76 | No Illinois | 89 | 3 | |
77 | Syracuse | 89 | 4 | |
78 | Tulsa | 89 | 2 | |
79 | Toledo | 88 | 3 | |
80 | Purdue | 88 | 5 | |
81 | Texas El Paso | 88 | 4 | |
82 | Indiana | 87 | 3 | |
83 | Louisiana Tech | 86 | 3 | |
84 | Wyoming | 85 | 3 | |
85 | Nevada | 85 | 3 | |
86 | Baylor | 84 | 3 | |
87 | Louisville | 84 | 4 | |
88 | Cent Florida | 82 | 3 | |
89 | No Carolina St | 82 | 4 | |
90 | Buffalo | 81 | 4 | |
91 | Mid Tennessee St | 80 | 3 | |
92 | Texas A&M | 78 | 3 | |
93 | West Michigan | 76 | 4 | |
94 | San Diego St | 74 | 4 | |
95 | Tulane | 73 | 4 | |
96 | Northwestern | 72 | 3 | |
97 | Washington St | 72 | 5 | |
98 | Alabama Birmingham | 72 | 4 | |
99 | Arkansas St | 70 | 4 | |
100 | Nevada Las Vegas | 69 | 5 | |
101 | Army | 67 | 4 | |
102 | Florida Atlantic | 66 | 4 | |
103 | Maryland | 65 | 5 | |
104 | Florida International | 64 | 5 | |
105 | San Jose St | 63 | 5 | |
106 | Kent St | 61 | 4 | |
107 | Illinois | 60 | 5 | |
108 | Vanderbilt | 58 | 5 | |
109 | No Texas | 55 | 5 | |
110 | Memphis | 55 | 5 | |
111 | Akron | 53 | 5 | |
112 | New Mexico St | 53 | 4 | |
113 | Utah St | 51 | 5 | |
114 | Miami Ohio | 51 | 7 | |
115 | Hawai'i | 49 | 4 | |
116 | East Michigan | 48 | 6 | |
117 | West Kentucky | 46 | 5 | |
118 | Rice | 45 | 7 | |
119 | Ball St | 42 | 6 | |
120 | New Mexico | 41 | 6 |
An objective calculation for ranking NCAA Division 1 FBS football teams based only on wins per game of the team, of their opponents, and of the opponents' opponents.
Sunday, October 18, 2009
17 October 2009 Ranking
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
21 Dec 2024 Ranking (after the 1st round of the CFP)
Rank Team Q Losses Next CFP opponent 1 Oregon 153 ...
-
The only values used in the calculation are: When the team plays a game (G) Whether the team wins (W) The wins per game of the ...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 149 0 2 Orego...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 145 0 2 Orego...
No comments:
Post a Comment