Q | Losses | |||
1 | Florida | 163 | 0 | |
2 | Iowa | 160 | 0 | |
3 | Texas | 155 | 0 | |
4 | Alabama | 153 | 0 | |
5 | Cincinnati | 151 | 0 | |
6 | Texas Christian | 151 | 0 | |
7 | Oregon | 149 | 1 | |
8 | Georgia Tech | 143 | 1 | |
9 | Pennsylvania St | 139 | 1 | |
10 | Louisiana St | 139 | 1 | |
11 | Boise St | 138 | 0 | |
12 | Wisconsin | 137 | 2 | |
13 | Houston | 135 | 1 | |
14 | Virginia Tech | 134 | 3 | |
15 | Pittsburg | 134 | 1 | |
16 | Miami Florida | 134 | 2 | |
17 | So California | 132 | 2 | |
18 | Arizona | 131 | 2 | |
19 | Oklahoma St | 129 | 2 | |
20 | Ohio St | 127 | 2 | |
21 | So Florida | 125 | 2 | |
22 | Utah | 125 | 1 | |
23 | Notre Dame | 125 | 2 | |
24 | Temple | 124 | 1 | |
25 | California | 122 | 2 | |
26 | West Virginia | 122 | 2 | |
27 | Clemson | 120 | 3 | |
28 | Oklahoma | 119 | 3 | |
29 | Auburn | 119 | 3 | |
30 | Oregon St | 118 | 3 | |
31 | Rutgers | 118 | 2 | |
32 | Troy | 118 | 2 | |
33 | Brigham Young | 117 | 2 | |
34 | Boston Coll | 115 | 3 | |
35 | Minnesota | 114 | 4 | |
36 | Texas Tech | 114 | 3 | |
37 | Navy | 113 | 3 | |
38 | Washington | 112 | 5 | |
39 | Tennessee | 112 | 4 | |
40 | Georgia | 112 | 4 | |
41 | Missouri | 111 | 3 | |
42 | Idaho | 110 | 2 | |
43 | So Carolina | 110 | 3 | |
44 | Cent Michigan | 110 | 2 | |
45 | Kentucky | 109 | 4 | |
46 | Kansas | 108 | 3 | |
47 | Nebraska | 108 | 3 | |
48 | No Carolina | 108 | 3 | |
49 | Duke | 107 | 2 | |
50 | Arkansas | 107 | 4 | |
51 | Mississippi | 107 | 3 | |
52 | Florida St | 106 | 4 | |
53 | Mississippi St | 105 | 5 | |
54 | Iowa St | 105 | 4 | |
55 | Texas A&M | 103 | 3 | |
56 | Air Force | 102 | 4 | |
57 | Fresno St | 102 | 3 | |
58 | Nevada | 101 | 3 | |
59 | Virginia | 101 | 4 | |
60 | Stanford | 101 | 3 | |
61 | Michigan St | 100 | 5 | |
62 | California Los Angeles | 100 | 5 | |
63 | Connecticut | 99 | 4 | |
64 | Michigan | 98 | 4 | |
65 | East Carolina | 97 | 3 | |
66 | So Methodist | 96 | 4 | |
67 | Cent Florida | 94 | 3 | |
68 | No Illinois | 94 | 3 | |
69 | Purdue | 93 | 6 | |
70 | Mid Tennessee St | 93 | 3 | |
71 | Marshall | 93 | 4 | |
72 | Bowling Green | 92 | 5 | |
73 | Kansas St | 91 | 4 | |
74 | Arizona St | 91 | 4 | |
75 | So Mississippi | 90 | 4 | |
76 | Syracuse | 89 | 5 | |
77 | Louisiana Monroe | 89 | 4 | |
78 | Louisville | 89 | 5 | |
79 | Ohio | 89 | 3 | |
80 | Colorado St | 87 | 6 | |
81 | Wyoming | 87 | 4 | |
82 | Northwestern | 86 | 4 | |
83 | Wake Forest | 84 | 5 | |
84 | Indiana | 83 | 5 | |
85 | Texas El Paso | 82 | 5 | |
86 | Toledo | 82 | 5 | |
87 | Kent St | 82 | 4 | |
88 | Alabama Birmingham | 80 | 5 | |
89 | San Diego St | 80 | 4 | |
90 | Baylor | 80 | 5 | |
91 | Colorado | 80 | 6 | |
92 | Louisiana Lafayette | 78 | 4 | |
93 | Buffalo | 77 | 5 | |
94 | West Michigan | 76 | 5 | |
95 | Nevada Las Vegas | 76 | 6 | |
96 | No Carolina St | 75 | 5 | |
97 | Tulsa | 75 | 4 | |
98 | San Jose St | 73 | 6 | |
99 | Florida Atlantic | 72 | 5 | |
100 | Army | 71 | 5 | |
101 | Washington St | 70 | 7 | |
102 | Louisiana Tech | 70 | 5 | |
103 | Maryland | 69 | 6 | |
104 | Arkansas St | 69 | 5 | |
105 | Tulane | 68 | 6 | |
106 | Florida International | 68 | 6 | |
107 | Illinois | 67 | 6 | |
108 | Utah St | 67 | 6 | |
109 | No Texas | 66 | 6 | |
110 | Miami Ohio | 65 | 8 | |
111 | Vanderbilt | 62 | 7 | |
112 | New Mexico St | 61 | 6 | |
113 | Memphis | 60 | 6 | |
114 | Hawai'i | 60 | 6 | |
115 | Ball St | 50 | 7 | |
116 | Akron | 45 | 7 | |
117 | Rice | 44 | 8 | |
118 | East Michigan | 42 | 8 | |
119 | West Kentucky | 41 | 7 | |
120 | New Mexico | 37 | 8 |
An objective calculation for ranking NCAA Division 1 FBS football teams based only on wins per game of the team, of their opponents, and of the opponents' opponents.
Monday, November 2, 2009
31 October 2009 Ranking
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
21 Dec 2024 Ranking (after the 1st round of the CFP)
Rank Team Q Losses Next CFP opponent 1 Oregon 153 ...
-
The only values used in the calculation are: When the team plays a game (G) Whether the team wins (W) The wins per game of the ...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 149 0 2 Orego...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 145 0 2 Orego...
No comments:
Post a Comment