| | Q | Losses | |
1 | Louisiana St | 165 | 0 | |
2 | Oklahoma St | 163 | 0 | |
3 | Missouri | 160 | 0 | |
4 | Boise St | 158 | 0 | |
5 | Oklahoma | 156 | 0 | |
6 | Auburn | 155 | 0 | |
7 | Kansas St | 153 | 1 | |
8 | Texas Christian | 153 | 0 | |
9 | Michigan St | 153 | 0 | |
10 | Nebraska | 150 | 0 | |
11 | Arizona | 146 | 1 | |
12 | So Carolina | 146 | 1 | |
13 | Ohio St | 142 | 0 | |
14 | Virginia Tech | 141 | 1 | |
15 | Oregon St | 138 | 2 | |
16 | Michigan | 137 | 1 | |
17 | No Carolina St | 135 | 1 | |
18 | Stanford | 134 | 1 | |
19 | Alabama | 133 | 1 | |
20 | Oregon | 132 | 0 | |
21 | Nevada | 132 | 0 | |
22 | Air Force | 131 | 1 | |
23 | West Virginia | 131 | 1 | |
24 | Iowa | 128 | 1 | |
25 | Arkansas | 128 | 1 | |
26 | Florida St | 127 | 1 | |
27 | Florida | 125 | 2 | |
28 | Mississippi St | 125 | 2 | |
29 | Illinois | 125 | 2 | |
30 | Utah | 122 | 0 | |
31 | No Carolina | 122 | 2 | |
32 | Mississippi | 119 | 1 | |
33 | California | 119 | 2 | |
34 | Notre Dame | 117 | 3 | |
35 | Colorado | 117 | 2 | |
36 | Wisconsin | 117 | 1 | |
37 | East Carolina | 115 | 2 | |
38 | Texas | 113 | 2 | |
39 | Maryland | 111 | 1 | |
40 | Northwestern | 111 | 1 | |
41 | Baylor | 110 | 2 | |
42 | So Mississippi | 109 | 2 | |
43 | California Los Angeles | 109 | 3 | |
44 | Iowa St | 108 | 3 | |
45 | Hawaii | 107 | 2 | |
46 | Texas A&M | 106 | 2 | |
47 | Miami Florida | 105 | 2 | |
48 | Texas Tech | 104 | 2 | |
49 | So Methodist | 104 | 2 | |
50 | Georgia Tech | 103 | 2 | |
51 | Toledo | 103 | 3 | |
52 | Cent Florida | 102 | 2 | |
53 | So California | 101 | 2 | |
54 | Houston | 100 | 2 | |
55 | Texas El Paso | 99 | 1 | |
56 | Temple | 99 | 2 | |
57 | Wyoming | 99 | 4 | |
58 | Kansas | 98 | 2 | |
59 | Troy | 98 | 2 | |
60 | Purdue | 98 | 2 | |
61 | Pennsylvania St | 97 | 3 | |
62 | Vanderbilt | 96 | 3 | |
63 | Kentucky | 96 | 3 | |
64 | Fresno St | 95 | 2 | |
65 | No Illinois | 95 | 2 | |
66 | San Diego St | 94 | 2 | |
67 | Cincinnati | 94 | 3 | |
68 | Syracuse | 93 | 1 | |
69 | Navy | 93 | 2 | |
70 | Tulsa | 92 | 3 | |
71 | Georgia | 91 | 4 | |
72 | Louisville | 91 | 2 | |
73 | Army | 91 | 2 | |
74 | Washington | 90 | 3 | |
75 | Arizona St | 90 | 3 | |
76 | Brigham Young | 89 | 4 | |
77 | Indiana | 89 | 2 | |
78 | Connecticut | 88 | 3 | |
79 | Miami Ohio | 87 | 3 | |
80 | Idaho | 86 | 2 | |
81 | Boston Coll | 85 | 3 | |
82 | Colorado St | 84 | 5 | |
83 | Rutgers | 83 | 2 | |
84 | So Florida | 81 | 2 | |
85 | Tennessee | 81 | 4 | |
86 | Clemson | 79 | 3 | |
87 | Louisiana Lafayette | 78 | 3 | |
88 | Louisiana Monroe | 78 | 3 | |
89 | West Michigan | 78 | 3 | |
90 | Tulane | 77 | 3 | |
91 | Arkansas St | 75 | 4 | |
92 | San Jose St | 74 | 4 | |
93 | Washington St | 73 | 5 | |
94 | Marshall | 71 | 4 | |
95 | Minnesota | 70 | 4 | |
96 | Wake Forest | 70 | 4 | |
97 | Nevada Las Vegas | 69 | 5 | |
98 | Pittsburg | 69 | 3 | |
99 | Ohio | 68 | 3 | |
100 | Rice | 66 | 5 | |
101 | Utah St | 66 | 4 | |
102 | New Mexico St | 64 | 4 | |
103 | Louisiana Tech | 61 | 4 | |
104 | Virginia | 60 | 3 | |
105 | Cent Michigan | 60 | 4 | |
106 | Memphis | 60 | 5 | |
107 | Buffalo | 59 | 3 | |
108 | Ball St | 57 | 3 | |
109 | Florida Atlantic | 53 | 4 | |
110 | Alabama Birmingham | 52 | 4 | |
111 | Bowling Green | 52 | 5 | |
112 | Duke | 49 | 4 | |
113 | Mid Tennessee St | 48 | 3 | |
114 | Florida International | 46 | 4 | |
115 | West Kentucky | 44 | 5 | |
116 | New Mexico | 44 | 6 | |
117 | Kent St | 41 | 3 | |
118 | East Michigan | 39 | 6 | |
119 | No Texas | 36 | 5 | |
120 | Akron | 35 | 5 |
An objective calculation for ranking NCAA Division 1 FBS football teams based only on wins per game of the team, of their opponents, and of the opponents' opponents.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
9 October 2010 Ranking
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
21 Dec 2024 Ranking (after the 1st round of the CFP)
Rank Team Q Losses Next CFP opponent 1 Oregon 153 ...
-
The only values used in the calculation are: When the team plays a game (G) Whether the team wins (W) The wins per game of the ...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 149 0 2 Orego...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 145 0 2 Orego...
No comments:
Post a Comment