Q | Losses | |||
1 | Auburn | 164 | 0 | |
2 | Missouri | 154 | 1 | |
3 | Oklahoma St | 152 | 1 | |
4 | Louisiana St | 149 | 1 | |
5 | Nebraska | 148 | 1 | |
6 | Michigan St | 147 | 1 | |
7 | Texas Christian | 147 | 0 | |
8 | Boise St | 145 | 0 | |
9 | Oklahoma | 144 | 1 | |
10 | Iowa | 139 | 2 | |
11 | Alabama | 138 | 1 | |
12 | Arizona | 137 | 1 | |
13 | Wisconsin | 136 | 1 | |
14 | Ohio St | 135 | 1 | |
15 | Oregon | 135 | 0 | |
16 | Utah | 134 | 0 | |
17 | Arkansas | 133 | 2 | |
18 | Virginia Tech | 132 | 1 | |
19 | Mississippi St | 131 | 2 | |
20 | No Carolina St | 130 | 2 | |
21 | Stanford | 129 | 1 | |
22 | Illinois | 129 | 3 | |
23 | Kansas St | 129 | 3 | |
24 | So Carolina | 126 | 2 | |
25 | Baylor | 124 | 2 | |
26 | Florida St | 123 | 2 | |
27 | Hawaii | 122 | 2 | |
28 | Nevada | 121 | 1 | |
29 | Florida | 121 | 3 | |
30 | Oregon St | 120 | 3 | |
31 | Cent Florida | 117 | 2 | |
32 | East Carolina | 117 | 3 | |
33 | Texas A&M | 117 | 3 | |
34 | Pennsylvania St | 116 | 3 | |
35 | No Carolina | 116 | 3 | |
36 | Iowa St | 114 | 4 | |
37 | Michigan | 113 | 3 | |
38 | Miami Florida | 111 | 3 | |
39 | So California | 110 | 3 | |
40 | Pittsburg | 109 | 3 | |
41 | Northwestern | 108 | 2 | |
42 | Air Force | 108 | 4 | |
43 | Temple | 108 | 2 | |
44 | Toledo | 107 | 3 | |
45 | San Diego St | 107 | 2 | |
46 | No Illinois | 107 | 2 | |
47 | Syracuse | 107 | 2 | |
48 | Maryland | 106 | 2 | |
49 | West Virginia | 106 | 3 | |
50 | Texas | 106 | 4 | |
51 | Mississippi | 104 | 4 | |
52 | Texas Tech | 104 | 4 | |
53 | Tulsa | 104 | 3 | |
54 | Washington | 102 | 5 | |
55 | Colorado | 102 | 5 | |
56 | Notre Dame | 101 | 5 | |
57 | Fresno St | 101 | 2 | |
58 | California | 100 | 4 | |
59 | So Methodist | 99 | 4 | |
60 | Clemson | 98 | 4 | |
61 | Georgia Tech | 98 | 3 | |
62 | Kentucky | 97 | 5 | |
63 | Troy | 97 | 3 | |
64 | Houston | 96 | 3 | |
65 | So Mississippi | 96 | 3 | |
66 | Ohio | 96 | 3 | |
67 | Navy | 96 | 3 | |
68 | California Los Angeles | 95 | 5 | |
69 | Miami Ohio | 94 | 4 | |
70 | Georgia | 94 | 5 | |
71 | Rutgers | 94 | 3 | |
72 | Army | 93 | 3 | |
73 | Purdue | 92 | 4 | |
74 | So Florida | 91 | 3 | |
75 | Louisiana Monroe | 90 | 4 | |
76 | Brigham Young | 89 | 5 | |
77 | Boston Coll | 89 | 5 | |
78 | Cincinnati | 87 | 5 | |
79 | Indiana | 86 | 4 | |
80 | Arizona St | 85 | 4 | |
81 | Connecticut | 85 | 4 | |
82 | Virginia | 85 | 4 | |
83 | Tennessee | 84 | 6 | |
84 | Alabama Birmingham | 84 | 5 | |
85 | Idaho | 83 | 4 | |
86 | Louisiana Tech | 82 | 5 | |
87 | Louisville | 82 | 4 | |
88 | Kansas | 82 | 5 | |
89 | Colorado St | 81 | 6 | |
90 | Vanderbilt | 81 | 6 | |
91 | Arkansas St | 80 | 5 | |
92 | Wyoming | 79 | 7 | |
93 | Marshall | 78 | 6 | |
94 | Tulane | 76 | 5 | |
95 | Rice | 76 | 6 | |
96 | Kent St | 74 | 4 | |
97 | Utah St | 73 | 6 | |
98 | Texas El Paso | 73 | 4 | |
99 | Minnesota | 72 | 7 | |
100 | Wake Forest | 72 | 6 | |
101 | West Michigan | 71 | 5 | |
102 | Duke | 70 | 6 | |
103 | Florida Atlantic | 69 | 5 | |
104 | Nevada Las Vegas | 68 | 7 | |
105 | Buffalo | 66 | 6 | |
106 | Washington St | 66 | 8 | |
107 | Florida International | 66 | 5 | |
108 | San Jose St | 66 | 8 | |
109 | Louisiana Lafayette | 65 | 6 | |
110 | New Mexico St | 63 | 6 | |
111 | Mid Tennessee St | 62 | 4 | |
112 | Memphis | 61 | 7 | |
113 | Bowling Green | 60 | 7 | |
114 | Cent Michigan | 54 | 7 | |
115 | No Texas | 51 | 6 | |
116 | West Kentucky | 50 | 7 | |
117 | East Michigan | 50 | 8 | |
118 | Ball St | 48 | 6 | |
119 | Akron | 45 | 8 | |
120 | New Mexico | 44 | 8 |
An objective calculation for ranking NCAA Division 1 FBS football teams based only on wins per game of the team, of their opponents, and of the opponents' opponents.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
30 October 2010 Ranking
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2024-2025 Ranking Final
Rank Team Q Losses 1 Ohio St 152.1 2 2 ...
-
The only values used in the calculation are: When the team plays a game (G) Whether the team wins (W) The wins per game of the ...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 149 0 2 Orego...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 145 0 2 Orego...
No comments:
Post a Comment