Q | Losses | |||
1 | Auburn | 166 | 0 | |
2 | Oklahoma St | 157 | 1 | |
3 | Louisiana St | 155 | 1 | |
4 | Texas Christian | 148 | 0 | |
5 | Boise St | 146 | 0 | |
6 | Nebraska | 146 | 1 | |
7 | Michigan St | 142 | 1 | |
8 | Oregon | 140 | 0 | |
9 | Missouri | 140 | 2 | |
10 | Iowa | 139 | 2 | |
11 | Arkansas | 138 | 2 | |
12 | Stanford | 136 | 1 | |
13 | Alabama | 136 | 2 | |
14 | Virginia Tech | 136 | 1 | |
15 | Wisconsin | 135 | 1 | |
16 | Ohio St | 135 | 1 | |
17 | Oklahoma | 132 | 2 | |
18 | Kansas St | 132 | 3 | |
19 | Mississippi St | 130 | 2 | |
20 | Utah | 130 | 1 | |
21 | Arizona | 129 | 2 | |
22 | Texas A&M | 127 | 3 | |
23 | Nevada | 124 | 1 | |
24 | Florida | 124 | 3 | |
25 | So Carolina | 122 | 3 | |
26 | Baylor | 122 | 3 | |
27 | No Carolina | 122 | 3 | |
28 | Pennsylvania St | 120 | 3 | |
29 | Michigan | 120 | 3 | |
30 | No Carolina St | 120 | 3 | |
31 | Cent Florida | 120 | 2 | |
32 | Miami Florida | 119 | 3 | |
33 | Hawaii | 119 | 3 | |
34 | Illinois | 117 | 4 | |
35 | Texas Tech | 114 | 4 | |
36 | Florida St | 113 | 3 | |
37 | Air Force | 112 | 4 | |
38 | San Diego St | 112 | 2 | |
39 | Iowa St | 112 | 5 | |
40 | East Carolina | 112 | 4 | |
41 | Temple | 112 | 2 | |
42 | So California | 112 | 3 | |
43 | Oregon St | 110 | 4 | |
44 | Clemson | 110 | 4 | |
45 | Pittsburg | 110 | 3 | |
46 | West Virginia | 107 | 3 | |
47 | Toledo | 107 | 3 | |
48 | Mississippi | 106 | 4 | |
49 | Fresno St | 106 | 2 | |
50 | Maryland | 106 | 3 | |
51 | No Illinois | 105 | 2 | |
52 | Navy | 105 | 3 | |
53 | Tulsa | 105 | 3 | |
54 | Notre Dame | 103 | 5 | |
55 | California Los Angeles | 102 | 5 | |
56 | Northwestern | 101 | 3 | |
57 | Texas | 99 | 5 | |
58 | So Mississippi | 99 | 3 | |
59 | Troy | 99 | 3 | |
60 | So Florida | 99 | 3 | |
61 | Ohio | 99 | 3 | |
62 | Washington | 98 | 6 | |
63 | Kentucky | 98 | 5 | |
64 | Syracuse | 98 | 3 | |
65 | California | 97 | 4 | |
66 | Georgia Tech | 96 | 4 | |
67 | Georgia | 94 | 5 | |
68 | Miami Ohio | 94 | 4 | |
69 | So Methodist | 93 | 5 | |
70 | Brigham Young | 93 | 5 | |
71 | Houston | 92 | 4 | |
72 | Louisville | 91 | 4 | |
73 | Colorado | 90 | 6 | |
74 | Boston Coll | 90 | 5 | |
75 | Purdue | 90 | 5 | |
76 | Kansas | 89 | 5 | |
77 | Army | 89 | 4 | |
78 | Rutgers | 88 | 4 | |
79 | Connecticut | 86 | 4 | |
80 | Tennessee | 86 | 6 | |
81 | Indiana | 86 | 5 | |
82 | Cincinnati | 86 | 5 | |
83 | Arkansas St | 86 | 5 | |
84 | Marshall | 85 | 6 | |
85 | Louisiana Monroe | 85 | 5 | |
86 | Louisiana Tech | 83 | 6 | |
87 | Texas El Paso | 82 | 4 | |
88 | Alabama Birmingham | 81 | 6 | |
89 | Arizona St | 81 | 5 | |
90 | Colorado St | 80 | 7 | |
91 | Vanderbilt | 79 | 7 | |
92 | Idaho | 79 | 5 | |
93 | Utah St | 79 | 6 | |
94 | Duke | 78 | 6 | |
95 | Florida International | 76 | 5 | |
96 | Kent St | 76 | 5 | |
97 | Virginia | 76 | 5 | |
98 | Florida Atlantic | 75 | 5 | |
99 | Minnesota | 74 | 8 | |
100 | Wyoming | 72 | 8 | |
101 | Tulane | 72 | 6 | |
102 | Rice | 71 | 7 | |
103 | Wake Forest | 69 | 7 | |
104 | Nevada Las Vegas | 66 | 8 | |
105 | San Jose St | 66 | 8 | |
106 | Buffalo | 65 | 7 | |
107 | Bowling Green | 65 | 7 | |
108 | Washington St | 64 | 9 | |
109 | Louisiana Lafayette | 64 | 7 | |
110 | West Michigan | 64 | 6 | |
111 | Cent Michigan | 63 | 7 | |
112 | New Mexico St | 62 | 7 | |
113 | Memphis | 57 | 8 | |
114 | Mid Tennessee St | 57 | 5 | |
115 | Ball St | 55 | 6 | |
116 | No Texas | 54 | 7 | |
117 | New Mexico | 53 | 8 | |
118 | East Michigan | 51 | 8 | |
119 | West Kentucky | 48 | 8 | |
120 | Akron | 40 | 9 |
An objective calculation for ranking NCAA Division 1 FBS football teams based only on wins per game of the team, of their opponents, and of the opponents' opponents.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
6 November 2010 Ranking
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2024-2025 Ranking Final
Rank Team Q Losses 1 Ohio St 152.1 2 2 ...
-
The only values used in the calculation are: When the team plays a game (G) Whether the team wins (W) The wins per game of the ...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 149 0 2 Orego...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 145 0 2 Orego...
No comments:
Post a Comment