Q | Losses | |||
1 | Louisiana St | 164 | 0 | |
2 | Oklahoma St | 162 | 0 | |
3 | Auburn | 160 | 0 | |
4 | Missouri | 158 | 0 | |
5 | Oklahoma | 158 | 0 | |
6 | Michigan St | 155 | 0 | |
7 | Texas Christian | 149 | 0 | |
8 | Kansas St | 147 | 1 | |
9 | Boise St | 147 | 0 | |
10 | Alabama | 137 | 1 | |
11 | Virginia Tech | 135 | 1 | |
12 | Stanford | 135 | 1 | |
13 | Iowa | 134 | 1 | |
14 | Ohio St | 133 | 1 | |
15 | Oregon | 133 | 0 | |
16 | Arizona | 132 | 1 | |
17 | Nebraska | 131 | 1 | |
18 | Wisconsin | 130 | 1 | |
19 | So Carolina | 130 | 2 | |
20 | West Virginia | 129 | 1 | |
21 | Utah | 128 | 0 | |
22 | East Carolina | 127 | 2 | |
23 | Michigan | 127 | 2 | |
24 | No Carolina | 126 | 2 | |
25 | Mississippi St | 126 | 2 | |
26 | Florida St | 126 | 1 | |
27 | No Carolina St | 126 | 2 | |
28 | Texas | 125 | 2 | |
29 | Arkansas | 125 | 2 | |
30 | Nevada | 122 | 1 | |
31 | Hawaii | 121 | 2 | |
32 | Illinois | 121 | 3 | |
33 | Florida | 120 | 3 | |
34 | Air Force | 119 | 2 | |
35 | Notre Dame | 118 | 3 | |
36 | Baylor | 117 | 2 | |
37 | Oregon St | 116 | 3 | |
38 | Northwestern | 112 | 1 | |
39 | So California | 112 | 2 | |
40 | Miami Florida | 111 | 2 | |
41 | Colorado | 111 | 3 | |
42 | Iowa St | 111 | 4 | |
43 | Mississippi | 110 | 2 | |
44 | Texas A&M | 109 | 3 | |
45 | So Mississippi | 109 | 2 | |
46 | San Diego St | 108 | 2 | |
47 | Texas Tech | 107 | 3 | |
48 | Kentucky | 106 | 3 | |
49 | Cent Florida | 106 | 2 | |
50 | Cincinnati | 106 | 3 | |
51 | Navy | 105 | 2 | |
52 | Troy | 105 | 2 | |
53 | California Los Angeles | 104 | 3 | |
54 | Purdue | 104 | 2 | |
55 | California | 104 | 3 | |
56 | Fresno St | 104 | 2 | |
57 | Georgia Tech | 103 | 2 | |
58 | Toledo | 102 | 3 | |
59 | Clemson | 101 | 3 | |
60 | Temple | 101 | 2 | |
61 | So Methodist | 101 | 3 | |
62 | Rutgers | 100 | 2 | |
63 | Maryland | 100 | 2 | |
64 | Washington | 98 | 3 | |
65 | Kansas | 97 | 3 | |
66 | Tulsa | 97 | 3 | |
67 | Miami Ohio | 97 | 3 | |
68 | Pennsylvania St | 96 | 3 | |
69 | No Illinois | 95 | 2 | |
70 | Indiana | 95 | 2 | |
71 | Georgia | 93 | 4 | |
72 | Wyoming | 93 | 5 | |
73 | Pittsburg | 92 | 3 | |
74 | Arizona St | 91 | 3 | |
75 | Brigham Young | 90 | 5 | |
76 | Army | 88 | 3 | |
77 | Vanderbilt | 88 | 4 | |
78 | Connecticut | 87 | 3 | |
79 | Texas El Paso | 86 | 2 | |
80 | Tennessee | 84 | 4 | |
81 | Houston | 83 | 3 | |
82 | Colorado St | 82 | 5 | |
83 | Boston Coll | 81 | 4 | |
84 | Louisiana Monroe | 81 | 3 | |
85 | Louisiana Tech | 79 | 4 | |
86 | Syracuse | 78 | 2 | |
87 | Rice | 78 | 5 | |
88 | Ohio | 77 | 3 | |
89 | Louisville | 76 | 3 | |
90 | So Florida | 76 | 3 | |
91 | Wake Forest | 76 | 5 | |
92 | Utah St | 76 | 4 | |
93 | Louisiana Lafayette | 75 | 4 | |
94 | Arkansas St | 73 | 5 | |
95 | Washington St | 73 | 6 | |
96 | Idaho | 72 | 3 | |
97 | West Michigan | 71 | 4 | |
98 | Minnesota | 71 | 5 | |
99 | San Jose St | 70 | 6 | |
100 | Alabama Birmingham | 70 | 4 | |
101 | Marshall | 69 | 5 | |
102 | Tulane | 68 | 4 | |
103 | Virginia | 66 | 4 | |
104 | New Mexico St | 63 | 5 | |
105 | Nevada Las Vegas | 63 | 6 | |
106 | Memphis | 62 | 6 | |
107 | Florida International | 62 | 4 | |
108 | Cent Michigan | 61 | 5 | |
109 | Buffalo | 61 | 4 | |
110 | Florida Atlantic | 59 | 4 | |
111 | Bowling Green | 55 | 6 | |
112 | East Michigan | 51 | 6 | |
113 | Ball St | 50 | 4 | |
114 | Mid Tennessee St | 50 | 4 | |
115 | Duke | 47 | 5 | |
116 | Kent St | 45 | 4 | |
117 | West Kentucky | 42 | 6 | |
118 | New Mexico | 41 | 6 | |
119 | No Texas | 39 | 6 | |
120 | Akron | 36 | 6 |
An objective calculation for ranking NCAA Division 1 FBS football teams based only on wins per game of the team, of their opponents, and of the opponents' opponents.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
16 October 2010 Ranking
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
21 Dec 2024 Ranking (after the 1st round of the CFP)
Rank Team Q Losses Next CFP opponent 1 Oregon 153 ...
-
The only values used in the calculation are: When the team plays a game (G) Whether the team wins (W) The wins per game of the ...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 149 0 2 Orego...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 145 0 2 Orego...
No comments:
Post a Comment