Q | Losses | |||
1 | Auburn | 167 | 0 | |
2 | Missouri | 166 | 0 | |
3 | Michigan St | 158 | 0 | |
4 | Louisiana St | 151 | 1 | |
5 | Texas Christian | 150 | 0 | |
6 | Oklahoma St | 150 | 1 | |
7 | Oklahoma | 148 | 1 | |
8 | Boise St | 145 | 0 | |
9 | Nebraska | 142 | 1 | |
10 | Ohio St | 139 | 1 | |
11 | Wisconsin | 136 | 1 | |
12 | Alabama | 135 | 1 | |
13 | Arizona | 135 | 1 | |
14 | Arkansas | 133 | 2 | |
15 | Kansas St | 133 | 2 | |
16 | So Carolina | 131 | 2 | |
17 | Oregon | 131 | 0 | |
18 | Florida St | 130 | 1 | |
19 | Illinois | 130 | 3 | |
20 | Utah | 129 | 0 | |
21 | Virginia Tech | 128 | 1 | |
22 | Iowa | 128 | 2 | |
23 | Stanford | 128 | 1 | |
24 | Mississippi St | 128 | 2 | |
25 | Miami Florida | 126 | 2 | |
26 | Baylor | 124 | 2 | |
27 | Nevada | 124 | 1 | |
28 | East Carolina | 123 | 2 | |
29 | Michigan | 122 | 2 | |
30 | No Carolina St | 121 | 2 | |
31 | Hawaii | 121 | 2 | |
32 | No Carolina | 118 | 3 | |
33 | Florida | 118 | 3 | |
34 | Oregon St | 115 | 3 | |
35 | Texas A&M | 115 | 3 | |
36 | Air Force | 115 | 3 | |
37 | West Virginia | 114 | 2 | |
38 | So California | 114 | 2 | |
39 | Navy | 113 | 2 | |
40 | Iowa St | 113 | 4 | |
41 | Clemson | 112 | 3 | |
42 | Texas | 112 | 3 | |
43 | Notre Dame | 111 | 4 | |
44 | Texas Tech | 110 | 3 | |
45 | So Mississippi | 108 | 2 | |
46 | San Diego St | 107 | 2 | |
47 | Colorado | 107 | 4 | |
48 | Toledo | 107 | 3 | |
49 | California | 106 | 3 | |
50 | Northwestern | 106 | 2 | |
51 | Pittsburg | 106 | 3 | |
52 | Maryland | 105 | 2 | |
53 | Cent Florida | 105 | 2 | |
54 | Mississippi | 104 | 3 | |
55 | Temple | 104 | 2 | |
56 | Troy | 104 | 2 | |
57 | Pennsylvania St | 102 | 3 | |
58 | No Illinois | 102 | 2 | |
59 | Syracuse | 102 | 2 | |
60 | Fresno St | 102 | 2 | |
61 | Kentucky | 101 | 4 | |
62 | Washington | 101 | 4 | |
63 | Georgia | 100 | 4 | |
64 | Purdue | 99 | 3 | |
65 | California Los Angeles | 98 | 4 | |
66 | Georgia Tech | 98 | 3 | |
67 | Tulsa | 96 | 3 | |
68 | Houston | 95 | 3 | |
69 | So Methodist | 95 | 4 | |
70 | Indiana | 92 | 3 | |
71 | Cincinnati | 92 | 4 | |
72 | Brigham Young | 92 | 5 | |
73 | Rutgers | 92 | 3 | |
74 | Miami Ohio | 91 | 4 | |
75 | So Florida | 90 | 3 | |
76 | Army | 90 | 3 | |
77 | Ohio | 88 | 3 | |
78 | Kansas | 86 | 4 | |
79 | Louisville | 85 | 3 | |
80 | Louisiana Tech | 84 | 4 | |
81 | Wyoming | 83 | 6 | |
82 | Arizona St | 82 | 4 | |
83 | Idaho | 82 | 3 | |
84 | Tennessee | 82 | 5 | |
85 | Vanderbilt | 81 | 5 | |
86 | Colorado St | 80 | 6 | |
87 | Tulane | 79 | 4 | |
88 | Arkansas St | 78 | 5 | |
89 | Boston Coll | 77 | 5 | |
90 | Louisiana Monroe | 77 | 4 | |
91 | Texas El Paso | 77 | 3 | |
92 | West Michigan | 77 | 4 | |
93 | Connecticut | 75 | 4 | |
94 | Utah St | 75 | 5 | |
95 | Wake Forest | 74 | 5 | |
96 | Rice | 73 | 6 | |
97 | Washington St | 71 | 7 | |
98 | Virginia | 71 | 4 | |
99 | San Jose St | 71 | 7 | |
100 | Alabama Birmingham | 70 | 5 | |
101 | Marshall | 70 | 6 | |
102 | Florida International | 69 | 4 | |
103 | Minnesota | 69 | 6 | |
104 | Louisiana Lafayette | 67 | 5 | |
105 | Memphis | 65 | 6 | |
106 | Nevada Las Vegas | 63 | 6 | |
107 | Buffalo | 62 | 5 | |
108 | Mid Tennessee St | 62 | 4 | |
109 | Kent St | 59 | 4 | |
110 | Cent Michigan | 58 | 6 | |
111 | New Mexico St | 57 | 6 | |
112 | Duke | 56 | 6 | |
113 | Florida Atlantic | 55 | 5 | |
114 | West Kentucky | 55 | 6 | |
115 | Ball St | 52 | 5 | |
116 | Bowling Green | 51 | 7 | |
117 | East Michigan | 45 | 7 | |
118 | New Mexico | 44 | 7 | |
119 | No Texas | 42 | 6 | |
120 | Akron | 40 | 7 |
An objective calculation for ranking NCAA Division 1 FBS football teams based only on wins per game of the team, of their opponents, and of the opponents' opponents.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
23 October 2010 Ranking
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
21 Dec 2024 Ranking (after the 1st round of the CFP)
Rank Team Q Losses Next CFP opponent 1 Oregon 153 ...
-
The only values used in the calculation are: When the team plays a game (G) Whether the team wins (W) The wins per game of the ...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 149 0 2 Orego...
-
Rank Team Q Losses 1 BYU 145 0 2 Orego...
No comments:
Post a Comment